What Percentage of Class Action Money Actually Goes to Lawyers?

Around 25% of a typical settlement fund — but only about 15% of all settlement money. The most complete study of federal class actions found a mean and median fee of roughly a quarter per case, while across every settlement in the study lawyers received about a seventh of the total, because the biggest funds pay the smallest percentages.

The real number, from the most complete study

Most articles quote “25 to 33%” without a source. The best evidence comes from Brian Fitzpatrick’s study in the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, which examined every federal class action settlement in 2006 and 2007 rather than a convenient sample. Judges approved 688 settlements worth nearly $33 billion. Of that, roughly $5 billion was awarded to class action lawyers — about 15% of the total, with a mean and median fee around 25% where judges used the percentage-of-the-fund method (full paper).

The gap between 25% and 15% is the part almost nobody explains, and it is the single most useful thing to understand here: fee percentages fall as settlements get bigger. A $2 million settlement might pay 30%; a $350 million one will not. Because the giant settlements hold most of the money, the dollar-weighted average lands well below the per-case average.

Where a settlement fund actually goes

A worked example makes the proportions concrete. This is illustrative arithmetic at the 25% mean rather than a figure from any particular case — every settlement differs, and the percentage falls as the fund grows.

The figure that decides your check is not in this table, though. It is how many people file against that remaining share — which is why two settlements of identical size routinely pay wildly different amounts per person.

How the fee is set and approved

The mechanism has a name: the common fund doctrine. It rests on a simple equitable idea — people who get the benefit of a lawsuit without paying for it would otherwise be unjustly enriched at the expense of whoever did pay. So the lawyers are paid out of the recovery itself rather than by the class members individually.

The Supreme Court took that further in Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert, 444 U.S. 472 (1980), holding that fees may be assessed against the entire fund — including the portion nobody ever claims — because absent class members who could have claimed still received a benefit (opinion). Read that next to the 9% median claims rate below and the implication is stark: the fee is calculated on the whole fund, most of which will never reach a single class member.

Class counsel do not simply take a cut. They apply to the court, the request is published, class members can object, and a judge rules at the fairness hearing. Two methods are used:

• Percentage of the fund. The judge awards a share of the settlement. Straightforward, and the most common approach.
• Lodestar. Hours actually worked multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate, then adjusted by a multiplier reflecting risk and difficulty. Often used as a cross-check on a percentage award — if the percentage implies an absurd effective hourly rate, that is a red flag to the court.

Fee percentages also vary by case type and by circuit, and they rise with how long the case took — a decade of unpaid work is treated differently from a quick settlement.

When judges cut the fee — a real example

The approval step is not a formality, and the clearest recent demonstration involves a settlement many people will recognise.

In T-Mobile’s $350 million data-breach settlement, class counsel asked for 22.5% — $78.75 million. The district court granted it. On appeal the Eighth Circuit overturned that award as a “windfall” and sent it back for reconsideration (case summary). Individual class members in that settlement received a $25 base payment, or $100 if they lived in California.

Hold both facts together, because they are the honest picture: the fee request was enormous relative to what any one person received — and an appellate court refused to let it stand. Judicial scrutiny of fees is real, if inconsistent.

What an incentive award is

Separate from attorney fees, the named plaintiffs — the handful of people who actually put their names on the lawsuit — often receive a service or incentive award. In the T-Mobile settlement that was $2,500 each; a few thousand dollars is typical, occasionally more in long or demanding cases.

Two things worth knowing. It is compensation for real work: sitting for depositions, producing documents, and being publicly attached to litigation against a large company for years. And it is not something ordinary class members receive or can apply for — if you are reading this because you are in a class, this line is not for you. Incentive awards are also legally contested. In Johnson v. NPAS Solutions, 975 F.3d 1244 (11th Cir. 2020), the Eleventh Circuit held them improper as “roughly analogous” to a salary; the Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal in 2023, and other circuits have gone the other way — so whether a named plaintiff can be paid one depends on where the case was filed. We cover this in detail in our guide to class action incentive awards.

What is actually left for you

After fees, litigation expenses and administration costs (notice, claim processing), the remainder is divided among everyone who files a valid claim. Two effects then dominate, and they pull in opposite directions.

Dilution. The more people who file, the less each receives when the fund is fixed. A $58 million privacy settlement paid claimants about $35.97 each. T-Mobile’s $350 million paid a $25 base. Fund size tells you almost nothing about your check.

Low turnout. The FTC studied 149 consumer settlements and found a median claims rate of 9%, falling to 3% when notice arrived by email (FTC staff report). Where a fund is non-reversionary, that low turnout means the people who do file receive more.

And sometimes the answer is bleaker than any percentage suggests. In one Home Depot accessibility settlement the company agreed to change its payment terminals, paid $65,000 in attorney fees and a $1,000 incentive award — and class members received nothing at all, because the relief was injunctive. A class action can succeed completely and pay you zero.

So does it mostly benefit the lawyers?

Here is the fair answer rather than either talking point.

Where the criticism lands. In small-value consumer cases the lawyers' recovery genuinely can dwarf the class's, especially when few people claim and the relief is a coupon or an injunction. The Home Depot example above is not an outlier.

Where it does not. The alternative is not a bigger check — it is no case at all. Nobody hires a lawyer over a $12 overcharge, so without a contingency-funded class action the company simply keeps the money. Counsel are paid only if they win, after fronting years of expert and discovery costs, and the percentage is set by a judge who can and does cut it.

The most useful thing to take away is that the fee percentage is not what determines your outcome. Whether you file is. A 25% fee on a settlement you claim from beats a 0% fee on one you never heard about — and with a 9% median claims rate, the money most often lost to consumers is not lost to lawyers, it is simply never claimed.

Common questions about class action fees

Do attorney fees come out of my individual payout?

Indirectly, yes. Fees are taken from the gross fund before anything is divided, so the amount you are offered already has them deducted. You are never billed and you never owe class counsel anything directly — if the case had lost, they would have been paid nothing at all.

Who pays the legal fees in a class action?

In practice the defendant does, because the fees come out of the settlement it agreed to pay. Class counsel work on contingency and front the cost of experts, depositions and filings themselves for years. There is no scenario in which a class member receives a bill.

How much does it cost to join or file a claim?

Nothing. Filing a claim is always free, and you do not need a lawyer of your own because the class already has one. Any website or caller asking for a fee, your card number or your bank login to “process” a settlement claim is running a scam.

Can I object to the attorney fees?

Yes. Class members can file a written objection before the fairness hearing, and the judge must consider it. There is no reliable figure for how much objections typically reduce a fee, but they are not merely symbolic — T-Mobile’s $78.75 million award was struck down on appeal as a windfall.

Is the percentage lower for very large settlements?

Yes, and this is well documented. Fee percentages are strongly and inversely associated with settlement size, which is why the per-case average is about 25% while the share of all settlement dollars going to lawyers is closer to 15%. Courts commonly apply a declining scale on the largest funds.

Do lawyers ever get more than a third?

Rarely. Most courts treat roughly a third as a soft ceiling, and anything above it needs real justification — extraordinary complexity, a novel legal theory, or a genuine risk the case would have been lost. Requests are also cross-checked against the hours actually worked.

Can I opt out to avoid the attorney fees?

You can opt out, but not to save money on fees — you never pay them anyway. Opting out means leaving the class to pursue your own case, which makes sense only if your loss is far larger than the settlement offers. You would then be responsible for your own legal costs, and you lose your share of the fund.

Check what you can actually claim

Fee percentages are out of your hands; filing is not. See the settlements open right now, our guide to claims that need no receipt, or the fuller explainer on how class actions work end to end. Filing direct with the administrator is always free, and Class Action Buddy auto-fills the official form if you would rather not retype everything — first claim free, no credit card.

Related Posts

More reading on similar topics.