> Skip to main content
HomeBlog › Ostergaard v. Microsoft: a new class action, filed July 2026

Ostergaard v. Microsoft: a new class action, filed July 2026

Read from the federal docket on 11 August 2026 · by Class Action Buddy

There is nothing to claim from this case. It is a complaint, not a settlement: no class has been certified, no fund exists and no claim form exists. This page records what the court’s own docket shows, so you can recognise the case if you hear about it — and recognise anyone who claims you can file for it today.

What the docket shows

CaseOstergaard v. Microsoft Corporation
CourtU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
JudgeJoseph Peter Stadtmueller
Docket number2:26-cv-01169
Filed1 July 2026
Cause recorded28 U.S.C. § 1332 — diversity, tort (non-motor vehicle)
Nature of suit240 Torts to Land
PartiesGarret Ostergaard, Joy Wade and David Wade (plaintiffs); Microsoft Corporation (defendant)
Jury demandYes, by the plaintiffs

Docket entry 1 is recorded as “COMPLAINT Class Action with Jury Demand; against Microsoft Corporation by Garret Ostergaard, Joy Wade, David Wade”, and entry 5 is an amended class action complaint against the same defendant. Three named plaintiffs, pleaded as a class.

The full docket is public on CourtListener, which mirrors the federal PACER system.

Why this is almost certainly not about software

The detail that matters here is the nature-of-suit code: 240, Torts to Land. That is the category a court clerk assigns to claims about real property — interference with land, damage to it, nuisance, trespass. It is not the code used for software, subscriptions, privacy or anything else you would buy from Microsoft.

The case is in the Eastern District of Wisconsin and is brought under diversity jurisdiction, which means the parties are from different states and more than $75,000 is at stake. If you are a Microsoft customer, this case is very unlikely to be about you — a land tort class action is normally brought by people who live near something, not by people who bought something. For the consumer picture, our Microsoft page covers what is actually on the docket.

What we could not confirm, and will not guess

  • What land, and what conduct. The nature-of-suit code tells you the category; it does not tell you the facts. The complaint is not in the public RECAP index, so we cannot say what is alleged to have happened or where.
  • Why the complaint was amended. Entry 5 is an amended class action complaint. Amendment early in a case is routine and the docket does not record the reason.
  • Who would be in the class. No class has been certified, and the proposed definition lives in the pleading.

Saying so matters more than it might seem. Pages that describe freshly filed cases in confident detail are usually describing the press release, or nothing at all. For the wider picture on this defendant, see our Microsoft class action page.

What has to happen before anyone is paid

Even in the cases that do end in money, filing is the start of a long road. Nothing is distributed until four gates have all opened, and they open in order:

  1. The claims deadline passes. Only then can the administrator review every claim, strip duplicates and fraud, and work out how many valid claims exist. Until that is done, nobody knows what a share is worth.
  2. The final approval hearing. A judge decides whether the settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate. The hearing being held is not the same as it being decided.
  3. The final approval order. Sometimes from the bench, sometimes months later. Nothing moves before it exists.
  4. The effective date. The one almost nobody has heard of, and the one that governs. After approval there is an appeal window of roughly 30 to 35 days. If anyone appeals, everything stops for every class member until it is resolved — commonly a year or more.

This case has not reached the first of those gates. It has not reached a settlement at all. Our guide to tracking a class action settlement's status explains the sequence with real dates from cases that are further along.

Frequently asked questions

Can I claim money from this Microsoft case as a customer?

Almost certainly not. The docket records the nature of suit as 240, Torts to Land, which is the category for claims about real property rather than about products or services. There is also no certified class, no settlement and no claim form.

What does “Torts to Land” mean?

It is the filing category courts use for claims about real property - trespass, nuisance, interference with land or damage to it. It is not used for software, subscriptions, privacy or consumer purchases.

Is this connected to the Microsoft browser extension case?

No. That is a separate consumer matter. Ostergaard v. Microsoft Corporation is a property claim filed in the Eastern District of Wisconsin on 1 July 2026, with three named plaintiffs.

How long could this case take?

There is no way to say, and most filed class actions never pay a consumer anything. Where money does reach class members it comes only after four gates: the claims deadline, the final approval hearing, the final approval order and the effective date. This case has reached none of them.

Want settlements you can actually file today rather than cases that might pay years from now? Our guide to settlements with no proof of purchase lists what is open right now, with deadlines.